VVG Receivables Intelligence — Interactive Simulation

Ask the Memory Layer

The questions a controller / CFO asks at month-end. Click one — every answer is grounded in source invoices.

How to use this

This is a self-guided simulation of a finance document workflow. Select a question or a pipeline stage to explore the fictional evidence behind the answer.

Walk the pipeline (top row). Click each stage left-to-right — Source → Ingest → Memory → Faculties → Intelligence — to see what that layer does with an invoice. This is the "how it works" tour.
At Ingest, hover the fields. Hover any extracted field and the exact text it came from lights up on the invoice. Every number is traceable to its source — never guessed.
At Memory, click the graph nodes. Click the red "Dispute" node and watch one dispute light up the three invoices it's freezing. This is why a network beats a list.
Ask a question (left panel). Click any of the six controller questions — e.g. "Why is Ceravance slow to pay?" — to get a cited answer with the layers that produced it.
Click the headline numbers. Every metric tile at the top (DSO, >90 days, disputes…) is clickable and drills into the detail behind it.

The 90-second tour, if you only have a minute

Ingest (hover a couple of fields) → Memory (click the Dispute node) → then ask "Why is Ceravance slow to pay?". That arc tells the whole story: raw invoice → connected network → the one-sentence answer that gets cash collected.

One thing to remember

All names, figures, and answers are illustrative. No client systems or records are connected to this example.

How the workflow fits together

A document workflow can connect the facts behind an aging report. This example illustrates that design using fictional data and prewritten answers.

Read the evidence. Invoices, approved contracts, and dispute correspondence supply the context.
Extract and cite. Link amounts, dates, and terms back to the source text for review.
Connect related records. Show when one dispute affects several invoices.
Prepare an action. Give the reviewer a suggested next step with the evidence that supports it.

A client implementation would need agreed source connections, access controls, quality evaluation, and a receiving team. No systems are connected in this demonstration.

About this demonstration

Built by Verity Vantage Group to illustrate a source-linked receivables workflow.

What you are exploring

The invoice names, balances, disputes, source excerpts, and answers are fictional sample data. The interactions run in your browser. They do not query a live AI service, access finance systems, or send collection messages.

From example to engagement

Start with a defined document set and a question your team needs answered. Build and evaluate the workflow on representative cases, then agree on deployment and handover.